2005 Policy State Laws 
Cannabis Law Report
MARCH 3, 2020
In Indianapolis on January 29, a quiet, eager audience of nurses give their rapt attention to Jason Straw as he takes center stage at the 2020 ISNA Policy Conference. ISNA 2020 POLICY CONFERENCE AGENDA, Jason Straw- Cannabis Policy. ISNA 2020 POLICY CONFERENCE AGENDA, Jason Straw- Cannabis Policy. PURPOSE : .
NewsMunchies
JULY 1, 2021
Justice Thomas said the Supreme Court’s ruling in 2005 upholding federal laws making marijuana possession illegal may now be out of date. Federal policies of the past 16 years have greatly undermined its reasoning,” he said. Raich , on the grounds that allowing local use would undermine a “comprehensive” federal regime.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Cannabis Law Report
JUNE 30, 2021
Calling the broader situation a “contradictory and unstable state of affairs,” Thomas wrote that the current legal landscape “strains basic principles of federalism and conceals traps for the unwary.” The whole statement is a strong argument, to be sure, but it’s not new from Thomas.
Cannabis Law Report
JUNE 6, 2022
This statement was made in connection with the denial of a petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in the case of Standing Akimbo, LLC v. United States. 1, 5 (2005). Raich, 545 U. In 2009, Congress enabled Washington D.
Cannabis Law Report
NOVEMBER 18, 2019
Furthermore, even if the contract violated the CSA, public policy under the Ninth Circuit decision in Bassidji argued for enforcement. Left Coast finally asked the court to refer the case back to state court or allow them to amend the initial pleading. 3) Not against public policy. Order to show Cause, ECF No. Goe , 413 F.3d
SpeedWeed
JULY 8, 2021
“This contradictory and unstable state of affairs strains basic principles of federalism and conceals traps for the unwary.”. Justice Thomas pointed out that the government has taken a hands-off policy towards state-legal medical cannabis businesses, even though federal law specifically prohibits marijuana in all forms.
Cannabis Law Report
JULY 27, 2022
The Supreme Court has held that even growing and using a marijuana plant at home for medical purposes, in accordance with state law, is an activity regulated by federal law because it may affect interstate commerce. Gonzales v. Raich , 545 U.S. citizens. INA § 101(f)(3).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
81 
Let's personalize your content