article thumbnail

Statements by Justice Clarence Thomas Are Not an Endorsement of Marijuana

NewsMunchies

Justice Thomas said the Supreme Court’s ruling in 2005 upholding federal laws making marijuana possession illegal may now be out of date. In his 5-page statement, Thomas noted that the Supreme Court had upheld federal prohibition of marijuana even within states in its 2005 decision in Gonzales v. However, the 10th U.S.

article thumbnail

MSNBC Report: Thomas Pronouncement On Cannabis Not Necessarily About Cannabis Per Se

Cannabis Law Report

Calling the broader situation a “contradictory and unstable state of affairs,” Thomas wrote that the current legal landscape “strains basic principles of federalism and conceals traps for the unwary.” ” Thomas went on to note also how merely having both marijuana and a firearm could lead to a person “find[ing] himself a federal felon.”.

Banking 78
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Jason Straw: Medical Cannabis Policy, ISNA 2020 Conference

Cannabis Law Report

Protection from criminal or civil penalties for patients using therapeutic marijuana and related cannabinoids as permitted under state laws. ? As a result, patients and families who gain access to or use marijuana for therapeutic purposes in a state that allows for its use are still at risk for criminal consequences. .

Policy 81
article thumbnail

DLG Learning Center: Half In, Half Out – Standing Akimbo, LLC v. United States, 594 U.S. (2021)

Cannabis Law Report

This statement was made in connection with the denial of a petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in the case of Standing Akimbo, LLC v. United States. 1, 5 (2005). Raich, 545 U. In 2009, Congress enabled Washington D.

article thumbnail

Cannabis Contract Woes in Washington State

Cannabis Law Report

Left Coast finally asked the court to refer the case back to state court or allow them to amend the initial pleading. Referring the case back to state court is warranted where the federal government has publicly declared that state law should be given deference. (Pl. Order to show Cause, ECF No. 17; citing Bassidji v.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Condemns Prohibition of Cannabis in the US

SpeedWeed

Congress has also specifically blocked the justice department from taking action against medical pot states for nearly a decade now. Thomas went on to note how the government’s overall cannabis policies have shifted since 2005, when the Supreme Court made a landmark ruling against California’s medical marijuana program.

Policy 52
article thumbnail

Crops, Guns & Commerce: A Game Theoretical Critique of Gonzales v. Raich

Cannabis Law Report

Posted: 2005. Law & Economics #: 05-21. Author(s): Maxwell Stearns. Availability: Full text (most recent) on SSRN. ABSTRACT: In Gonzales v.