Collective Retail State Laws 
Canna Law Blog
MAY 19, 2019
But a newly collected body of evidence-based research suggests that the fears and prohibitions are unsupported by the facts. What were once unregulated, crudely adorned storefronts are now state-licensed, tightly regulated, and elegantly designed boutiques. miles) increased in value by approximately 8.4
Cannabis Chronicles
JUNE 27, 2019
They also reflect updates to state law, such as eliminating “collective gardens,” which were previously used for medical marijuana. Anderson said the planning commission recommended that retail marijuana businesses be permitted to operate in commercial areas in the Vancouver urban growth area but not in rural centers.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Cannabis Law Report
JUNE 14, 2022
Massachusetts municipalities have collected more than $53 million in “impact” fees from cannabis companies since the launch of adult-use sales in 2018, according to a Northeaster University study published by the Massachusetts Cannabis Business Association outlined in a Boston Globe report. The Franklin Observer writes.
Dykema (Cannabis Law Blog)
FEBRUARY 22, 2022
As sovereign nations, tribes can generally make their own rules for their business ventures and members on tribal lands, with state law potentially applicable only in sharply limited circumstances. Generally speaking, tribes regulate and operate their businesses free from state regulation.
NORML
MARCH 15, 2019
Additionally, Representatives Charlie Crist (D-FL) and Don Young (R-AK) introduced The Fairness in Federal Drug Testing Under State Laws Act to explicitly bar federal agencies from discriminating against workers solely because of their status as a cannabis consumer, or due to testing positive for marijuana use on a workplace drug test.
MJ Business Attorneys
MAY 29, 2018
For starters, this case clarifies that the federal government can neither force the states to enforce federal marijuana policy, nor can they prohibit the states from implementing or revising their own marijuana policies. Murphy holds that state-law repeals are not pre-emptible.
Cannabis Law Report
MARCH 19, 2022
. “Further,” she wrote, “the victim in this case is society, not the government, because the alleged pecuniary loss here is a theoretical reduction of the available tax revenue to provide public goods and services than would have been available if the defendants operated a licensed retail marijuana cultivation facility.”
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
89 
Let's personalize your content