DEA Seed-To-Sale State Laws 
Project CBD
AUGUST 23, 2023
and any part of that plant, including the seeds thereof and all derivatives , extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers, whether growing or not , with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 Whether growing or not” is being misconstrued to mean that the 0.3
SpeedWeed
SEPTEMBER 7, 2021
In fact, the seed-to-sale producer doesn’t even make edibles. If you see a product for sale with our logo outside a licensed Arizona dispensary, it ain’t us.” . Our license allows us to sell only in the state of Arizona, only to licensed (cannabis) dispensaries,” Slosburg said. It was his own company’s logo. .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Cannabis Law Report
JANUARY 13, 2022
In The Weeds welcomes the new year, as well as a number of new cannabis laws and policies taking effect around the country in 2022. Below is a list of state law updates to look forward to this year. 1, Montana permits retail marijuana sales for adults 21 and older. Montana: As of Jan. Louisiana: As of Jan.
Cannabis Law Report
NOVEMBER 2, 2021
The companies are advertising it as a legal way to get high, touting medical benefits and generally making big promises about what they can deliver, but an investigation from the US Cannabis Council has found illegal levels of delta-9 THC in products for sale around the country. But it can’t really be as bad as it sounds, can it?
Canna Law Blog
MAY 29, 2024
I, as well as another colleague here at the firm, tend to think on balance that these products are not permitted under current federal law. But, it bears mentioning that DEA’s interpretations are just that. And here, I tend to think that federal courts would side with DEA. Let’s take a look.
Canna Law Blog
SEPTEMBER 29, 2023
And why didn’t it address the manufacture or sale of intoxicating hemp products? In order to have a protectible trademark, the good or service must be lawful in commerce. The infringer argued that delta-8 products were not lawful. So to answer the titular question, no, the court did not legalize anything in all 50 states.
Canna Law Blog
SEPTEMBER 29, 2023
And why didn’t it address the manufacture or sale of intoxicating hemp products? In order to have a protectible trademark, the good or service must be lawful in commerce. The infringer argued that delta-8 products were not lawful. So to answer the titular question, no, the court did not legalize anything in all 50 states.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
141 
Let's personalize your content